
CI5
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CI5
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -2.0572 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 49.5/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 49.5/100, indicating potential issues with earnings sustainability.
- Cash conversion score of 0.0/100 suggests that earnings are not translating into cash flow, which is a significant concern.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.0572 is below the manipulation threshold, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Receivables score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of accounts receivable.
The significant concentration of ownership, with the top shareholder holding 51.0%, poses risks of potential conflicts of interest and lack of minority shareholder protection.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and consider conducting further due diligence on the company's operational practices before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CI5 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate