
CID
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CID
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2019
CID exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.8059, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation; however, the earnings quality score of 61.4 suggests potential concerns, particularly with revenue and margin metrics. The concentrated ownership structure raises governance risks, particularly with the dominant individual shareholder holding over 51%.
- Earnings Quality Score of 61.4 indicates potential issues, especially with revenue and margin metrics at 0.0/100.
- High concentration of ownership with Trần Duy Hải holding 51.1% raises governance concerns.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.8059 suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong receivables metric at 100.0/100 indicates effective collection practices.
The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards individual shareholders, particularly Trần Duy Hải with 51.1%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor CID's earnings quality metrics and governance practices, considering a cautious approach until improvements in revenue and margin metrics are observed.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CID — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate