PTO
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PTO
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
PTO exhibits several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -1.7557, which is close to the manipulation threshold. Additionally, the earnings quality score of 36.5/100, particularly low cash conversion metrics, suggests significant risks in revenue recognition and cash flow management.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.7557, indicating potential earnings manipulation as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 36.5/100, with cash conversion at 0.0/100, highlighting severe issues in converting earnings to cash.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100, indicating strong management of accounts receivable.
The top shareholder, Tập Đoàn Bưu Chính Viễn Thông Việt Nam, holds a significant 30% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest or influence over financial reporting practices.
Investors should closely monitor PTO's financial disclosures for signs of earnings manipulation and consider a cautious approach, potentially waiting for improved earnings quality metrics before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PTO — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate