FPT
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — FPT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
FPT demonstrates a solid financial profile with a Beneish M-Score of -2.2323, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. The earnings quality score of 90.3/100 further supports the company's financial integrity, although some metrics suggest areas for improvement.
- SGI at 1.1156 indicates a growth rate higher than sales, which could suggest aggressive revenue recognition practices.
- Cash conversion score of 72.6/100 indicates potential issues with converting earnings into cash flow.
- Earnings quality score of 90.3/100 reflects strong overall earnings integrity.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates excellent management of receivables, enhancing cash flow reliability.
The ownership structure is relatively diversified with no single shareholder holding a controlling stake, reducing the risk of undue influence on management decisions. However, the presence of state-owned enterprises may introduce some regulatory risks.
Monitor growth metrics closely, particularly SGI, to ensure revenue growth is sustainable. Consider further analysis of cash flow conversion to assess operational efficiency.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for FPT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate