
L40
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — L40
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
L40 exhibits significant red flags related to potential earnings manipulation, as indicated by a Beneish M-Score of 3.0321, well above the threshold of -1.78. The company's poor earnings quality score of 0.7/100, particularly in cash conversion and revenue metrics, raises concerns about the reliability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 3.0321 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 0.7/100, with eq_cash_conv and eq_revenue both at 0.0/100, suggests severe issues with cash flow and revenue recognition.
- Ownership by the state (26.4%) may provide some level of stability, although it also raises concerns about potential influence on financial reporting.
The significant state ownership (26.4%) combined with substantial individual holdings creates a concentrated ownership structure, which may lead to conflicts of interest and less transparency in financial reporting.
Investors should exercise caution and consider conducting deeper due diligence on L40's financial practices before making investment decisions, particularly focusing on cash flow and revenue recognition.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for L40 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate