
LHG
Real EstateValuation Breakdown
Real estate developers in Vietnam report land banks at historical acquisition cost (Vietnamese Accounting Standards don't allow revaluation). This means book value severely understates true asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (revalued net asset value, applying a 1.5x factor to book value) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — LHG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
LHG exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.1175, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant concerns, particularly in cash conversion and revenue recognition, which could pose risks to the reliability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 50.1/100, with a cash conversion score of 0.0/100 indicating severe issues in converting earnings into cash.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 suggests potential overstatement of revenues or aggressive accounting practices.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.1175, which is below the manipulation threshold, suggesting lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of receivables.
The concentrated ownership structure, with the top shareholder holding 48.7%, may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest, impacting minority shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow and revenue recognition practices, considering a cautious approach to investment in LHG due to the elevated risks in earnings quality.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for LHG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate