PTB
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PTB
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PTB exhibits a low risk of earnings manipulation, as indicated by a Beneish M-Score of -2.4989, well below the threshold for potential manipulation. The earnings quality score of 79.5/100 reflects strong performance in key areas, although revenue recognition remains a concern.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 suggests potential issues with revenue recognition practices.
- Strong earnings quality metrics with an accrual score of 95.7/100 and receivables score of 100.0/100 indicate robust financial health.
The ownership structure is concentrated among a few individuals, which could pose risks related to governance and decision-making, but also suggests a commitment to the company's long-term success.
Monitor revenue recognition practices closely due to the low revenue quality score, while considering the overall strong earnings quality metrics as a positive indicator for investment.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PTB — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate