
STS
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — STS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -2.2895 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant concerns, particularly with revenue recognition and margin quality, which could suggest underlying operational issues.
- Earnings Quality Score of 63.7/100 indicates potential issues with revenue recognition, particularly the score of 0.0/100 in eq_revenue.
- SGI of 1.2095 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by actual sales, raising concerns about sustainability.
- The DSRI of 0.9932 indicates that inventory levels are well managed relative to sales, which is a positive sign.
- High eq_receivables score of 100.0/100 suggests strong management of receivables, indicating effective credit control.
The ownership structure is concentrated, with the top two shareholders holding nearly 49.1% of shares, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and operational performance metrics. Consider a cautious approach to investment until clearer signs of sustainable growth and improved earnings quality are evident.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for STS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate