VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Construction sector

HAM

Construction
Công ty Cổ phần Vật tư Hậu Giang
Xây dựng và Vật liệuCT
71.000
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Fairly Valued
Low
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
68.930
Current
71.000
Gap
-2.9%
ModelEV EBITDA DCF BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTXây dựng và Vật liệuConstruction
Classified as construction because ICB sector "Xây dựng và Vật liệu" maps to the construction group
ModelEV/EBITDA + DCF Blend
Intrinsic = 50% x EV/EBITDA Value + 50% x DCF Value

Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.100
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
12.20%
Ke
12.20%
x
E/(D+E)
18.99%
+
Kd(1-t)
6.78%
x
D/(D+E)
81.01%
=
WACC
10.00%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend2.75%
Growth decays 12%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
4
Valuation
50%EV/EBITDA Value
43.560
50%DCF Value
94.300
Blended Intrinsic
68.930
Value Decomposition
35%
65%
Explicit period (35%)Terminal value (65%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HAM

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2024

62
Fair
Accrual Quality
60
Cash Conversion
100
Receivables
82
Margin Stability
35
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2024

-3.27
Low Risk
DSRI
0.627
GMI
0.882
AQI
1.276
SGI
0.964
DEPI
1.078
SGAI
1.187
TATA
-0.101
LVGI
0.907

The analysis of HAM indicates a moderate risk level, primarily due to its Beneish M-Score of -3.2696, which suggests a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal significant weaknesses, particularly in revenue recognition and profit margins, which could signal underlying operational issues.

Red Flags
  • The earnings quality score of 61.6/100 is concerning, especially the eq_margin at 34.7/100, indicating potential issues with profitability.
  • The eq_revenue score of 0.0/100 raises red flags about the company's revenue recognition practices.
Positive Signals
  • The DSRI of 0.6274 suggests that inventory levels are well managed relative to sales, indicating operational efficiency.
  • The cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow generation relative to earnings, which is a positive signal for liquidity.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure is fragmented with no single shareholder holding a controlling stake, which may lead to governance challenges. However, the presence of multiple individual shareholders could also indicate a level of commitment to the company.

Recommendation

Investors should closely monitor HAM's revenue recognition practices and operational efficiency. A deeper dive into management's strategies for improving profit margins and addressing the low revenue quality score is advisable before making significant investment decisions.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
7/9
Strong
Z-Score
3.27
Safe Zone
Sharpe
1.72
Excellent
Composite
62
Fair
Price Risk
Momentum
+35.1%
Volatility
51.1%
Max Drawdown
-18.5%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2024
11.19P/E
P/B1.80
P/S0.15
ROE17.8%
ROA3.5%
EPS4330.14
BVPS25845.93
Gross Margin12.1%
Net Margin1.4%
D/E2.77
Current Ratio0.92
Rev Growth-2.9%
Profit Growth19.4%
EV/EBITDA7.98
Div Yield2.6%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
9.6M
Charter Capital
96.4B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Industry (ICB L3)
Xây dựng và Vật liệu
Sub-industry
Vật liệu xây dựng & Nội thất
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for HAM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Lê Hoàng Nam
Indiv
7.3%
704.568
Vũ Thị Thủy
Indiv
5.4%
521.307
Lương Văn Sĩ
Indiv
4.7%
453.156
Trần Thị Phượng
Indiv
4.1%
398.625
Đào Thị Vững
Indiv
3.9%
380.370
Quách Yến Vân
Indiv
3.7%
354.433
Lâm Thị Trúc Hà
Indiv
3.2%
309.300
Lê Văn Chung
Indiv
3.0%
289.302
Nguyễn Thị Liên
Indiv
2.8%
268.557
Đào Vũ Hồng Ngọc
Indiv
2.8%
265.146
Lâm Anh Truyền
Indiv
2.5%
244.960
Nguyễn Chiến Mạnh
Indiv
1.1%
110.718
Lâm Thị Thu Hiền
Indiv
1.1%
109.200
Đào Đức Đại
Indiv
1.0%
95.137
Khổng Liên Phương
Indiv
0.6%
60.675
Huỳnh Tú Mỹ
Indiv
0.2%
18.787
Lâm Thị Lệ Hà
Indiv
0.1%
10.780
Lý Chí Kiên
Indiv
0.1%
7.000
Nguyễn Thành Được
Indiv
0.1%
6.000
Board & Management
Lê Hoàng Nam7.3%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Lâm Thị Trúc Hà3.2%
Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Mai Bảo Ngọc2.0%
Tổng Giám đốc/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Lâm Thị Thu Hiền1.1%
Kế toán trưởng
Đào Đức Đại1.0%
Thành viên Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ/Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Huỳnh Việt Hùng
Người phụ trách quản trị công ty/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin
Phạm Văn Hùng
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Phạm Ngọc Minh
Phó Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị/Trưởng Ban Kiểm toán nội bộ
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →