
PVT
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PVT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PVT exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.3737, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation; however, several components such as GMI and SGI suggest potential revenue growth concerns. The earnings quality score of 75.2/100 is relatively strong, but low revenue quality raises caution regarding sustainability.
- GMI of 1.4274 indicates a significant increase in gross margin, which may not be sustainable.
- SGI of 1.3679 suggests aggressive revenue growth that could be inflated.
- EQ Revenue score of 38.2/100 indicates potential issues with revenue recognition.
- Earnings Quality Score of 75.2/100 reflects overall strong earnings quality.
- Cash conversion and receivables metrics are perfect at 100.0/100, indicating strong cash flow management.
The majority ownership by Tập Đoàn Công Nghiệp – Năng Lượng Quốc Gia Việt Nam at 51.0% may lead to potential governance risks, as decisions may favor state interests over minority shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor revenue growth trends and consider a deeper analysis of revenue recognition practices before making investment decisions. Maintaining a cautious approach is advisable given the elevated risk signals.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PVT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate