PVS
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — PVS
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
PVS exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.3592, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it falls below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the SGI of 1.3696 suggests aggressive growth, which could be a concern in the context of Vietnamese market dynamics.
- SGI of 1.3696 indicates aggressive growth that may not be sustainable in the current market environment.
- Earnings Quality Score of 88.9/100 reflects strong earnings quality, particularly with an eq_receivables score of 100.0/100.
The top shareholder, Tập Đoàn Công Nghiệp – Năng Lượng Quốc Gia Việt Nam, holds a significant 51.4% stake, indicating a strong influence over corporate governance and strategic decisions, which may reduce the risk of minority shareholder exploitation.
Monitor the company's growth strategies closely due to the elevated SGI, while leveraging the strong earnings quality metrics to assess future performance. Consider a cautious investment approach until more clarity on growth sustainability is achieved.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for PVS — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate