SAM
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SAM
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -1.6511 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 40.1/100, particularly the zero scores in cash conversion and revenue quality, raises significant concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 40.1/100 indicates poor earnings quality, especially with 0.0/100 in cash conversion and revenue quality.
- SGI of 1.8355 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by actual cash flows.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.6511 is above the manipulation threshold, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- High receivables quality score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of receivables.
The ownership structure shows a fragmented shareholder base with no single entity holding a significant controlling stake, which may lead to governance challenges and misalignment of interests.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow metrics and revenue quality before making investment decisions, considering the elevated risk signals. A deeper analysis of operational performance and growth sustainability is recommended.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SAM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate