SCC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SCC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
SCC exhibits significant risks of earnings manipulation, as indicated by a Beneish M-Score of 2.909, well above the manipulation threshold of -1.78. Additionally, the company's earnings quality score of 45.1/100 highlights substantial weaknesses in cash conversion and revenue recognition, raising concerns about the reliability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of 2.909 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 45.1/100, with eq_cash_conv at 8.8/100, suggests poor cash conversion relative to earnings.
- DSRI of 0.1294 indicates a low level of receivables relative to sales, which could suggest effective credit management.
- High eq_receivables score of 100.0/100 indicates that the company is effectively managing its receivables.
The top shareholders hold a concentrated ownership structure, with the largest individual shareholder owning 39.2%. This concentration may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence, particularly focusing on cash flow statements and revenue recognition practices before considering any investment in SCC.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SCC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate