
SCG
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SCG
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SCG exhibits several concerning indicators that suggest potential earnings manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -2.222, which is below the manipulation threshold. Despite a relatively strong earnings quality score of 59.7, the high SGI of 2.4105 raises concerns about revenue growth sustainability.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.222 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78.
- SGI of 2.4105 suggests aggressive revenue growth that may not be sustainable.
- Earnings Quality Score of 59.7/100 indicates a reasonable level of earnings quality, particularly with perfect scores in cash conversion and receivables.
The ownership structure is highly concentrated, with the top three shareholders holding 38% of the company, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor SCG's revenue growth and earnings quality metrics, and consider a cautious approach until clearer signs of sustainable performance emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SCG — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate