VNVALUEVNVALUE
Updated weekly
Back to Dashboard
Technology sector

SGT

Technology
Công ty Cổ phần Công nghệ Viễn thông Sài Gòn
Công nghệ Thông tin/Phần mềm & Dịch vụ Máy tínhCT
15.350
VND · Last close
Valuation Verdict
Overvalued
Medium
-120%Fair Value+120%
Intrinsic Value
11.524
Current
15.350
Gap
-24.9%
ModelDCF PE BLEND

Valuation Breakdown

CTCông nghệ Thông tinTechnology
Classified as technology because ICB sector "Công nghệ Thông tin" maps to the technology group
ModelDCF + P/E Blend
Intrinsic = 60% x DCF Value + 40% x (Fair P/E x EPS)

Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.

1
Weighted Avg Cost of Capital
Risk-Free (Rf)
4.50%
+
Betasector default
1.300
x
ERP
4.25%
+
CRP
2.75%
=
Cost of Equity (Ke)
13.60%
Ke
13.60%
x
E/(D+E)
27.48%
+
Kd(1-t)
4.76%
x
D/(D+E)
72.52%
=
WACC
10.00%
2
Growth Estimate
fundamental firm blend8.00%
Growth decays 5%/yr toward terminal
3
Model Inputs
Max fair P/E16x
4
Valuation
60%DCF Value
-4.780
40%P/E Value
35.979
Blended Intrinsic
11.524
Value Decomposition
39%
61%
Explicit period (39%)Terminal value (61%)

Valuation Track Record

Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SGT

Earnings Quality

Fiscal year 2025

43
Weak
Accrual Quality
85
Cash Conversion
9
Receivables
100
Margin Stability
0
Revenue Quality
0

Financial Forensics

Beneish M-Score · 2025

-2.87
Low Risk
DSRI
0.561
GMI
0.584
AQI
1.038
SGI
1.006
DEPI
1.231
SGAI
1.094
TATA
0.038
LVGI
0.916

SGT exhibits several concerning indicators related to earnings quality and potential manipulation, as evidenced by its Beneish M-Score of -2.8673, which is significantly below the manipulation threshold. While the company shows some strengths in its receivables and accrual metrics, the overall earnings quality score of 43.4/100 suggests substantial risks.

Red Flags
  • Beneish M-Score of -2.8673 indicates potential earnings manipulation, significantly below the threshold of -1.78.
  • Earnings Quality Score of 43.4/100, with particularly low scores in revenue (0.0/100) and margin (0.0/100), raises concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
  • Low cash conversion rate of 8.9/100 suggests that earnings may not be translating into actual cash flow.
Positive Signals
  • Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates strong management of receivables, suggesting effective credit policies.
  • DSRI of 0.5610 indicates that the company is managing its inventory efficiently relative to sales.
Ownership Risk

The ownership structure shows significant state involvement with 21.5% held by a state-owned enterprise, which may influence operational decisions and financial reporting. Institutional ownership at 16.9% could provide some level of oversight.

Recommendation

Investors should approach SGT with caution, focusing on improving earnings quality and monitoring cash flow conversion. A thorough review of financial statements and ongoing developments is recommended before making investment decisions.

Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.

Quantitative Scores

F-Score
6/9
Neutral
Z-Score
1.20
Distress Zone
Sharpe
-1.05
Negative
Composite
25
Poor
Price Risk
Momentum
-24.9%
Volatility
23.8%
Max Drawdown
-29.0%

Key Ratios

Fiscal year 2025
6.83P/E
P/B1.05
P/S1.22
ROE16.7%
ROA4.2%
EPS2248.70
BVPS14550.18
Gross Margin47.2%
Net Margin17.9%
D/E2.16
Current Ratio1.67
Rev Growth0.6%
Profit Growth155.9%
EV/EBITDA8.16
Div Yield0.0%

Company Overview

Issued Shares
148.0M
Charter Capital
1480.0B VND
Sector (ICB L2)
Công nghệ Thông tin
Industry (ICB L3)
Phần mềm & Dịch vụ Máy tính
Sub-industry
Internet
Company Type
CT

// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK

> mapping common ownership for SGT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate

Shareholders
Tổng Công ty Phát triển Đô thị Kinh Bắc - CTCP
State
21.5%
31.8 trieu
Công ty TNHH Đầu Tư Phát Triển Dtt
Inst
16.9%
25.0 trieu
Đặng Thanh Tâm
Indiv
6.8%
10.1 trieu
Đặng Thị Hoàng Phượng
Indiv
5.0%
7.5 trieu
Nguyễn Thị Kim Xuân
Indiv
5.0%
7.5 trieu
Phạm Thị Lê
Indiv
5.0%
3.7 trieu
Công ty Cổ Phần Tư Vấn Thiết Kế & Xây Dựng Thành Phố Mới
Inst
4.9%
7.3 trieu
nguyen-thanh-hai
Indiv
4.9%
3.6 trieu
Công ty Cổ Phần Đầu Tư Sài Gòn
Inst
3.6%
5.3 trieu
Công ty Cổ phần Mỹ phẩm Sài Gòn
Inst
2.8%
2.0 trieu
Quỹ Đầu Tư Hạ Tầng PVI
Inst
2.6%
3.8 trieu
nguyen-son
Indiv
1.6%
2.4 trieu
Nguyễn Thị Kim Thanh
Indiv
1.5%
2.2 trieu
Lê Thị Kim Nhung
Indiv
1.1%
1.7 trieu
Nguyễn Vĩnh Thọ
Indiv
0.2%
164.450
Công ty Cổ phần Quản lý Quỹ PVI
Inst
0.2%
250.000
Board & Management
Đặng Thanh Tâm6.8%
Chủ tịch Hội đồng Quản trị
Nguyễn Thị Kim Thanh1.5%
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị
Lê Thị Kim Nhung1.1%
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Lê Nguyễn Hoàng Anh
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phó Tổng Giám đốc/Kế toán trưởng
Hồ Thị Kim Oanh
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập
Vũ Ngọc Ánh
Phó Tổng Giám đốc
Sú Ngọc Bích
Thành viên Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Đức Thuận
Trưởng Ban kiểm soát
Nguyễn Cẩm Phương
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị/Phụ trách Công bố thông tin/Tổng Giám đốc
Nguyễn Thanh Thái
Thành viên Hội đồng Quản trị độc lập
Computed 12/04/2026
Methodology & Disclosure

vnvalue is a methodology engine — not an advisor. Every number is the deterministic output of a published formula applied to public financial data. Nothing on this page constitutes investment, financial, legal, or tax advice, nor a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security.

All data, models, and outputs are provided AS IS without warranty of any kind. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions. Past performance and historical valuations are not indicative of future results.

By using vnvalue you accept the Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. Full disclaimer →