SJE
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — SJE
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
SJE exhibits significant red flags indicating potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by a Beneish M-Score of -0.3611, well above the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The low earnings quality score of 14.0/100, particularly concerning cash conversion and receivables, further raises concerns about the reliability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -0.3611 indicates potential earnings manipulation, as it is significantly above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 14.0/100, with eq_cash_conv and eq_receivables both at 0.0/100, suggests severe issues with cash flow and revenue recognition.
- DSRI of 2.3371 indicates that the company's inventory growth is not outpacing revenue growth, which may suggest some operational stability.
The high concentration of ownership, with Công ty TNHH Đầu Tư Energy Việt Nam holding 56.0%, poses a risk of potential conflicts of interest and lack of minority shareholder protection.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence, particularly regarding cash flow and revenue recognition practices, before considering any investment in SJE.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for SJE — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate