
TDC
Real EstateValuation Breakdown
Real estate developers in Vietnam report land banks at historical acquisition cost (Vietnamese Accounting Standards don't allow revaluation). This means book value severely understates true asset value. This model blends two approaches: an RNAV proxy (revalued net asset value, applying a 1.5x factor to book value) weighted 40%, and a DCF on normalized cash flows weighted 60%. Highly leveraged firms receive a +2% WACC penalty.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TDC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
TDC exhibits several concerning financial metrics, particularly a high GMI of 2.5689, indicating potential earnings manipulation. Despite a negative Beneish M-Score of -0.3858, which suggests no immediate red flags for manipulation, the low earnings quality score of 34.8/100 raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- High GMI of 2.5689 indicates potential earnings manipulation risk.
- Earnings Quality Score of 34.8/100 reflects poor earnings quality, particularly with cash conversion at 0.0/100.
- DSRI of 0.7454 suggests a lower risk of revenue manipulation through inventory management.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates strong management of receivables.
The concentrated ownership structure, with the largest shareholder holding 47.7%, poses a risk of governance issues and potential conflicts of interest, particularly in decision-making processes.
Investors should closely monitor TDC's earnings quality and cash conversion metrics, and consider a cautious approach until clearer signs of financial stability and transparency emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TDC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate