TTN
TechnologyValuation Breakdown
Technology companies combine high growth potential with the risk of overvaluation. This model blends DCF (60% weight, capturing long-duration growth) with a P/E sanity check (40% weight, capping speculative excess). The DCF uses the slowest growth decay (0.05) recognizing that tech companies can sustain competitive advantages longer. The P/E component applies a dynamic ceiling: max P/E = min(growth% x 1.5, 30), preventing runaway valuations.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TTN
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
TTN exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.8049, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation; however, the earnings quality score of 71.1 suggests potential concerns, particularly in revenue recognition. The ownership structure shows a significant concentration with 48.6% held by a single institution, which may pose governance risks.
- Earnings quality margin score at 46.3/100 indicates potential issues with profitability sustainability.
- Revenue quality score at 0.0/100 raises concerns about the reliability of revenue recognition practices.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.8049 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings.
The top shareholder, Tập đoàn Đầu tư và Phát triển Công nghiệp Becamex, holds a substantial 48.6% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced minority shareholder influence.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices and consider diversifying their holdings to mitigate risks associated with concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TTN — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate