DZM
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DZM
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
DZM exhibits several concerning indicators of potential earnings manipulation, as evidenced by its Beneish M-Score of -2.569, which is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. The earnings quality score of 46.6/100, particularly low in cash conversion and receivables, further raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.569 indicates potential earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 46.6/100 suggests weak earnings quality, particularly with eq_cash_conv at 40.0/100 and eq_receivables at 0.2/100.
- DSRI of 1.0290 indicates inventory levels are in line with sales, which is a positive sign for operational efficiency.
- Strong eq_accrual score of 89.8/100 suggests that the company is generating earnings that are not purely accounting-driven.
The ownership structure shows a concentration of shares among a few individuals and institutions, with the largest shareholder holding only 10.8%. This could lead to potential governance issues and a lack of accountability.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence, particularly focusing on cash flow and receivables management, before considering any investment in DZM.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DZM — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate