
VFC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VFC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
VFC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.5639, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal some concerns, particularly in revenue recognition, which could pose risks to future performance.
- Earnings Quality Score of 74.5/100, with a concerning eq_revenue score of 0.0/100 indicating potential issues in revenue recognition.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5639 suggests a low probability of earnings manipulation, reflecting a potentially more reliable earnings report.
The high concentration of ownership, with 51.3% held by Công ty Cổ Phần Logistics Asg and 44.6% by The Shibusawa Warehouse Ltd., may limit shareholder influence and raise concerns about governance and decision-making.
Investors should closely monitor VFC's revenue recognition practices and consider diversifying their portfolio to mitigate risks associated with ownership concentration.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VFC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate