
BPC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — BPC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
BPC exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.8272, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 80.5 suggests some concerns, particularly with revenue recognition, which scored 0.0/100.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 indicates significant issues with revenue recognition.
- SGAI at 1.2439 suggests aggressive spending on sales and marketing, which may not translate to revenue growth.
- Earnings Quality Score of 80.5/100 reflects strong accruals (89.3/100) and cash conversion (100.0/100), indicating good operational efficiency.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.8272 is well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggesting low risk of earnings manipulation.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam holding 49.0%, which may lead to potential governance issues and conflicts of interest.
Investors should monitor revenue recognition practices closely, given the low score in that area, while considering the strong cash conversion metrics as a positive sign for operational health.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for BPC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate