
BXH
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — BXH
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
BXH exhibits several concerning financial metrics that suggest potential manipulation, particularly with a Beneish M-Score of -2.7842, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 70.3/100, driven by strong cash conversion and receivables metrics, provides a counterbalance to these risks.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.7842 indicates potential manipulation, as it is well below the threshold of -1.78.
- SGI of 1.5567 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Earnings Quality Score of 70.3/100 indicates relatively strong earnings quality, particularly with cash conversion at 100.0/100.
- Low DSRI of 0.5748 suggests that inventory levels are well managed compared to sales.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam holding 49.0%, which may lead to governance risks and potential conflicts of interest.
Investors should closely monitor BXH's financial disclosures for signs of earnings manipulation and consider diversifying their holdings due to the concentrated ownership structure.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for BXH — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate