
VTV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — VTV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
VTV exhibits a concerning Beneish M-Score of -4.7812, significantly below the manipulation threshold, indicating potential earnings manipulation. The earnings quality score of 45.5/100, particularly low in accruals and margins, raises further concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -4.7812 indicates potential earnings manipulation, well below the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 45.5/100, with an accrual score of 0.0/100, suggests poor earnings sustainability.
- Cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates strong cash flow relative to earnings, suggesting operational efficiency.
The high concentration of ownership, with Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam holding 62.9%, poses risks related to governance and potential conflicts of interest, particularly in a state-owned enterprise context.
Investors should approach VTV with caution, considering the elevated risk of earnings manipulation. It may be prudent to monitor future earnings reports closely and assess cash flow sustainability before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for VTV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate