HUB
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HUB
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
HUB's Beneish M-Score of -1.79 is marginally below the manipulation threshold, indicating potential earnings manipulation. The earnings quality score of 69.0 suggests moderate reliability, but the low cash conversion rate of 40.4 raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.79 is close to the manipulation threshold of -1.78, indicating potential earnings manipulation.
- Earnings quality cash conversion at 40.4/100 is significantly low, suggesting that reported earnings may not be translating into actual cash flow.
- Receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates excellent management of receivables, suggesting strong credit control.
- The SGI of 0.9876 indicates stable sales growth, which is a positive sign in the context of the Vietnamese market.
The top shareholder, Công ty Cổ phần Phát triển Nhà Bà Rịa Vũng Tàu, holds a significant 40.0% stake, which may lead to potential conflicts of interest and reduced minority shareholder influence.
Investors should closely monitor HUB's cash flow performance and consider engaging with management regarding earnings quality. A cautious approach is advised until further clarity on financial practices is obtained.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for HUB — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate