NXT
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — NXT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of 2.0414 indicates a high likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it exceeds the threshold of -1.78. While the earnings quality score of 71.0 suggests reasonable performance, significant weaknesses in revenue recognition and margin metrics raise concerns.
- Beneish M-Score of 2.0414 indicates potential earnings manipulation.
- Earnings quality margin score of 45.4/100 is notably low, suggesting potential issues with profitability sustainability.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 raises significant concerns about the reliability of reported revenues.
- Strong cash conversion score of 100.0/100 indicates effective cash management.
- Low SGI of 0.9982 suggests stable sales growth, which is a positive indicator in the current market context.
The ownership structure is fragmented with no single shareholder holding a significant majority, which may lead to governance challenges and potential conflicts of interest among individual shareholders.
Investors should conduct further due diligence on revenue recognition practices and consider monitoring quarterly results closely. It may be prudent to adopt a cautious approach to investment until clearer signals of earnings integrity emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for NXT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate