
ACV
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — ACV
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
ACV exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7965, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. The company's earnings quality score of 84.4/100, particularly strong cash conversion metrics, suggests solid operational performance despite some concerns in revenue quality.
- Revenue quality score is low at 36.0/100, indicating potential issues in recognizing revenue accurately.
- Strong earnings quality score of 84.4/100, with perfect cash conversion and receivables metrics, indicating effective cash management.
The ownership structure is heavily dominated by state entities, with 95.4% held by the Ministry of Finance and the State Capital Investment Corporation, which may limit minority shareholder influence and raise concerns about governance.
Investors should monitor revenue recognition practices closely due to the low revenue quality score while leveraging the company's strong cash conversion capabilities for potential growth.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for ACV — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate