GVR
CyclicalsValuation Breakdown
Cyclical companies (chemicals, oil & gas, basic resources) have earnings that swing dramatically with commodity prices and economic cycles. Valuing them on a single year's earnings is misleading: they look cheap at peaks and expensive at troughs. This model uses 7-year median EBITDA ("mid-cycle" earnings) and a 7-year median EV/EBITDA multiple to estimate what the firm is worth at a normal point in the cycle.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — GVR
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
GVR demonstrates a low risk of earnings manipulation based on its Beneish M-Score of -2.5959, significantly below the manipulation threshold. The company also showcases strong earnings quality metrics, particularly in accruals and receivables, indicating solid financial health.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.5959, well below the manipulation threshold of -1.78, suggests low likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Earnings Quality Score of 84.2/100, with high scores in eq_accrual (97.8/100) and eq_receivables (100.0/100), indicating strong earnings quality.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with 96.8% held by state entities, which may limit minority shareholders' influence but also suggests stability in governance.
Investors should monitor GVR for any changes in earnings quality metrics and remain aware of the implications of state ownership on operational decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for GVR — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate