
BBH
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — BBH
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2019
BBH exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -4.6352, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation. However, the earnings quality score of 48.3 suggests potential concerns regarding the sustainability of earnings, particularly in receivables management.
- Earnings Quality Score of 48.3 indicates potential issues with earnings sustainability, particularly with a low receivables score of 37.3.
- The SGI of 0.8029 suggests a declining sales growth rate, which may impact future revenue generation.
- A DSRI of 0.5702 indicates that inventory levels are well-managed relative to sales, reducing the risk of overstatement.
- An AQI of 1.0000 reflects strong cash conversion, suggesting that the company is effectively converting earnings into cash.
The top shareholder, Tổng Công ty Xi măng Việt Nam, holds a significant 27.8% stake, indicating a strong institutional presence. However, the fragmented nature of individual ownership may lead to governance challenges.
Monitor the company's receivables closely and assess the sustainability of cash flows. Consider a cautious approach to investment until there is improvement in earnings quality metrics.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for BBH — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate