
CCR
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CCR
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -1.9536 indicates a potential risk of earnings manipulation, as it exceeds the threshold of -1.78. Despite a strong earnings quality score of 75.3, the significant concentration of ownership in state-owned enterprises raises concerns about governance and transparency.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.9536, indicating potential earnings manipulation risk.
- High SGI of 1.4564 suggests aggressive revenue growth, which may not be sustainable.
- Earnings Quality Score of 75.3/100, indicating generally strong earnings quality.
- Cash conversion metrics are perfect at 100.0/100, suggesting effective cash management.
The ownership structure is heavily skewed towards state-owned enterprises, with Tổng Công ty Hàng hải Việt Nam holding 80.9%, which may lead to conflicts of interest and reduced accountability.
Investors should closely monitor CCR's financial disclosures for signs of earnings manipulation and consider diversifying their holdings due to the high concentration of ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CCR — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate