CCT
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CCT
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CCT exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.7595, indicating a lower risk of earnings manipulation compared to the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality metrics reveal concerns, particularly in revenue and margin quality, which could signal underlying operational issues.
- Earnings Quality Score of 76.1/100 indicates potential weaknesses in margin quality (42.1/100) and revenue quality (52.9/100), suggesting possible revenue recognition issues.
- Strong cash conversion (100.0/100) and receivables quality (100.0/100) indicate effective cash management and collection processes.
The overwhelming ownership by Tổng Công ty Hàng hải Việt Nam (99.0%) raises concerns about governance and minority shareholder rights, potentially limiting transparency and accountability.
Investors should closely monitor CCT's operational performance and earnings quality metrics, particularly focusing on revenue recognition practices, while considering the implications of concentrated ownership.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CCT — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate