
CDN
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — CDN
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
CDN exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -2.1181, indicating a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 88.5/100 reveals strengths in cash conversion and receivables management, while revenue recognition remains a concern.
- Revenue quality is low with an eq_revenue score of 45.8/100, indicating potential issues in revenue recognition practices.
- Strong earnings quality metrics with an eq_cash_conv score of 100.0/100, suggesting excellent cash conversion efficiency.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated, with Tổng Công ty Hàng hải Việt Nam holding 75.0%, which may limit minority shareholder influence and raise concerns about governance practices.
Investors should closely monitor revenue recognition practices due to the low eq_revenue score, while also considering the strong cash conversion metrics as a positive aspect of CDN's financial health.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for CDN — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate