
DND
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — DND
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
DND exhibits a Beneish M-Score of -1.6807, indicating a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is above the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 33.3/100, particularly low scores in receivables and margin metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of reported earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 33.3/100, indicating significant issues with accruals and cash conversion.
- Receivables score of 0.0/100 suggests potential issues with revenue recognition and collection efficiency.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.6807 suggests a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- Revenue quality score of 95.3/100 indicates strong revenue generation capabilities.
The top three institutional shareholders collectively hold 84.4% of DND, which may lead to concentrated decision-making and potential conflicts of interest, impacting minority shareholder rights.
Investors should monitor DND's earnings quality closely, particularly the receivables and margin metrics, while considering a cautious approach to investment due to the elevated risk factors.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for DND — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate