EIC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — EIC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
EIC presents a moderate risk profile with potential earnings manipulation indicated by a Beneish M-Score of -1.2844, which is above the threshold for likely manipulation. The earnings quality score of 44.7 suggests significant concerns, particularly in cash conversion and revenue recognition.
- Beneish M-Score of -1.2844, indicating potential earnings manipulation risk as it is above the threshold of -1.78.
- Earnings Quality Score of 44.7, with a cash conversion score of 0.0, highlighting severe issues in converting earnings to cash.
- Receivables and margin metrics are at 100.0, indicating strong management of receivables and profitability margins.
The ownership structure is heavily concentrated with institutional investors holding over 75% of shares, which may reduce volatility but could also lead to governance risks if aligned interests are not transparent.
Investors should exercise caution and conduct further due diligence, particularly focusing on cash flow statements and revenue recognition practices before making investment decisions.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for EIC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate