HU1
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HU1
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -2.2226 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the manipulation threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 39.9/100, particularly the cash conversion score of 0.0/100, raises concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 39.9/100, with cash conversion at 0.0/100, indicating severe issues in converting earnings to cash.
- SGI of 1.2703 suggests aggressive growth that may not be supported by underlying fundamentals.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.2226, which is below the manipulation threshold, suggesting a lower risk of earnings manipulation.
- High receivables score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of receivables, which is a positive sign for liquidity.
The top shareholder, Vũ Nhật Tuấn, holds a significant 51.0% stake, which may lead to potential governance risks and lack of minority shareholder protection.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow metrics and consider the high ownership concentration as a risk factor. A cautious approach is advised until earnings quality improves.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for HU1 — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate