
HBD
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — HBD
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2024
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2024
The Beneish M-Score of -2.3213 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 58.8 suggests some concerns, particularly with cash conversion and revenue recognition, which could signal potential risks in financial reporting.
- Earnings Quality Score of 58.8/100 indicates moderate concerns, particularly a low cash conversion score of 35.0/100.
- Revenue quality score of 0.0/100 raises significant concerns about the reliability of reported revenues.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.3213 suggests a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation.
- Strong receivables quality score of 100.0/100 indicates effective management of receivables.
The concentrated ownership structure, with the top four shareholders holding 63.5% of shares, poses a risk of potential conflicts of interest and governance issues, which can affect minority shareholders.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow and revenue recognition practices while considering a cautious approach to investment due to the elevated risks associated with ownership concentration and earnings quality.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for HBD — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate