
TJC
ConstructionValuation Breakdown
Construction and industrial firms have characteristics of both cyclical businesses (lumpy project-based revenue) and growth companies (expanding order books). This model blends two approaches 50/50: EV/EBITDA valuation (captures current earning power relative to peers) and FCF-based DCF (captures future cash generation potential). If EV/EBITDA produces a negative value (debt exceeds enterprise value), only DCF is used.
Valuation Track Record
Retroactive intrinsic value vs actual close price — TJC
Earnings Quality
Fiscal year 2025
Financial Forensics
Beneish M-Score · 2025
The Beneish M-Score of -2.4555 indicates a low likelihood of earnings manipulation, as it is below the threshold of -1.78. However, the earnings quality score of 47.6/100, particularly the 0.0/100 in cash conversion and revenue metrics, raises concerns about the sustainability of earnings.
- Earnings Quality Score of 47.6/100, with 0.0/100 in cash conversion indicating potential issues in converting earnings to cash.
- SGI of 1.1635 suggests aggressive revenue growth which may not be supported by cash flow, raising concerns about revenue recognition practices.
- Beneish M-Score of -2.4555 indicates a lower likelihood of earnings manipulation compared to the threshold.
- Strong receivables score of 100.0/100 suggests effective management of accounts receivable.
The high concentration of ownership with Transimex and Vietnam Maritime Corporation holding a combined 91.2% poses risks related to governance and minority shareholder rights.
Investors should closely monitor cash flow performance and revenue recognition practices. Consider a cautious approach to investment until clearer indicators of earnings sustainability emerge.
Generated by AI based on quantitative data. Not financial advice.
Quantitative Scores
Key Ratios
Company Overview
// OWNERSHIP_NETWORK
> mapping common ownership for TJC — hover nodes for intel, click to navigate